The Norwegian gambling monopoly is a subject of ongoing debate, with supporters emphasizing its alignment with protecting vulnerable individuals. However, the lack of factual evidence supporting the monopoly’s efficacy and the rise of online gambling in neighboring countries challenge its continued existence.
I. The Alignment of Wish, Freedom, and Protection
The Norwegian gambling monopoly’s foundation lies in the pursuit of harmonizing individuals’ desire and freedom to gamble with the imperative of safeguarding vulnerable populations. Balancing these aspects is crucial, and the monopoly claims to achieve this delicate equilibrium. However, it is essential to examine whether the monopoly is truly effective in achieving its goals.
II. The Disconnect between Perception and Reality
Recent editorial support for maintaining the gambling monopoly in Norway relies heavily on stereotypical perceptions rather than factual evidence. Unfortunately, the national gambling debate often prioritizes outdated ideologies over current market realities. To foster progress, it is necessary to shift the focus to a more data-driven approach, considering the experiences of neighboring countries.
III. The Call for Cooperation
A Norwegian treatment organization has reported a significant increase in inquiries from problem gamblers during the pandemic. The Norwegian Trade Association for Online Gambling (NBO), representing non-Norwegian-regulated companies, advocates for collaboration to detect, prevent, and treat problem gambling. While there is no scientific basis to link gambling with rising living costs, the pandemic has highlighted the need for enhanced measures. Cooperation across the industry can be the most effective way to address the issue comprehensively.
IV. Inefficiencies of the Monopoly System
Approximately half of all online sports betting and casino games in Norway occur outside the gambling monopoly. Although the state-owned company Norsk Tipping implements responsible gambling measures, these efforts do not extend to players engaging with non-monopoly platforms. This lack of channelization mirrors the experiences of Denmark and Sweden, leading to their decision to regulate their domestic markets. The evaluation of Sweden’s reregulation showcases increased market control and better conditions for achieving national gambling policy goals.
V. Embracing Responsibility Measures for the Majority
Sweden’s success in achieving responsible gambling lies in the collaboration between former competitors. Joint responsibility measures targeting multiple players and mandatory tools like Spelpaus contribute to increased transparency and a shared commitment to combating problem gambling. In contrast, the leakages within Norway’s monopoly system hinder the implementation of similar effective measures. Furthermore, a refusal to share data with independent research projects implies a lack of willingness to contribute to an evidence-based approach.
VI. Learning from Finland’s Experience
While some point to Finland as a proponent of a gambling monopoly, recent developments suggest a shifting perspective. The consolidation of gambling offerings under the state-owned company Veikkaus and stricter legislation against non-regulated operators failed to reverse the decline in market share. As a result, Finland is now considering reregulating its gaming monopoly in favor of a licensing system. Norway must take note of these developments and reflect on the efficacy of its own gambling policy.
As Norway grapples with its gambling policy, it is essential to critically analyze the existing monopoly system. The alignment of wish, freedom, and protection is a commendable goal, but evidence-based approaches and cooperation among industry stakeholders are paramount to its success. The experiences of neighboring countries, such as Sweden and Finland, provide valuable insights into the benefits of regulation and collaboration. To pave the way for an effective gambling policy, Norway must reassess its stance and explore alternative models that prioritize responsible gambling and better protect its citizens.