In a recent development, a member of the Macau Legislative Assembly (AL), José Maria Pereira Coutinho, has raised concerns about the sudden closure of the Macau Jockey Club (MJC) and its impact on the livelihoods of its employees. The Macau government announced earlier this month its decision to terminate the contract with the MJC effective April 1, 2024, citing the cessation of horse racing activities with no plans for future resumption.
Coutinho, in a written interpellation, expressed that he has received numerous requests for assistance from MJC employees who were reportedly caught off guard by the abrupt closure. The government had assured that the MJC would handle the rights and interests of its 254 local staff in compliance with the law.
The Director of the Macau Labor Affairs Bureau, Wong Chi Hong, mentioned during a press conference that the MJC’s shareholders had indicated their willingness to facilitate the transition of employees to other companies within their ownership.
However, concerns linger among MJC staff regarding the uncertainty of their future employment. Despite assurances from the government, some employees interviewed on race day expressed doubts about successfully securing referrals to other companies.
Coutinho, seeking clarification from the government, questioned the specific measures taken to protect the jobs of the 570 employees, both local and foreign, and ensure the well-being of their families in the wake of the concessionaire’s termination.
Contractual Obligations and Investment Commitments
The MJC was awarded a 24-year contract by the SAR government in 2018, subject to conditions requiring significant investments, including the development of two hotels, two apartment buildings, and a tennis court by December 31, 2026. Coutinho pointed out that the termination of the MJC’s concession effectively absolves the club of its MOP$1.25 billion (US$155 million) investment commitment without any compensation requirement.
This raises questions about the potential compromise of public interest and the government’s rationale for waiving any form of compensation from the MJC. Coutinho seeks clarity on whether the government has thoroughly considered the implications of this decision on the broader community.
Employee Concerns and Government Response
The crux of the issue lies in the well-being of the MJC employees, who now face job insecurity and an uncertain future. Coutinho highlighted that the government’s decision to terminate the contract without consulting various associations representing the rights and interests of the employees has contributed to their distress.
Wong Chi Hong’s statement about other companies within the shareholders’ portfolio being willing to absorb MJC employees is met with skepticism among the affected staff. The government is under scrutiny to provide concrete details about the measures in place to ensure a smooth transition for employees, considering the potential challenges in securing alternative employment.
Transparency and Consultation Process
One of the prominent concerns raised by Coutinho is the lack of transparency in the decision-making process. The sudden announcement of the termination agreement without the knowledge of the majority of employees and without consultation with relevant associations has fueled discontent.
The government faces scrutiny over its communication strategy and the extent to which it involved key stakeholders in the decision-making process. Transparent and inclusive decision-making is essential in situations that impact a significant number of individuals and their families.
Compromised Investment Commitments and Public Interest
The termination of the MJC’s contract raises questions about the government’s commitment to upholding contractual obligations and ensuring the fulfillment of the MOP$1.25 billion investment commitment. Coutinho’s query about the potential compromise of public interest in not seeking compensation from the MJC underscores the need for a comprehensive explanation from the government.
The public has a right to understand the reasoning behind decisions that may impact the economic landscape and the livelihoods of citizens. The government’s response to these concerns will be crucial in maintaining public trust and confidence in its decision-making processes.
As the Macau Jockey Club faces closure, the government is under increasing scrutiny for its handling of the situation. The concerns raised by AL member José Maria Pereira Coutinho encompass job protection, transparency, and the fulfillment of contractual obligations. The fate of the 570 employees, the potential compromise of public interest, and the absence of compensation requirements from the MJC are central issues that demand thorough examination.
The government’s ability to address these concerns, provide clarity on the future of MJC employees, and justify its decisions will be pivotal in shaping public perception. As this situation unfolds, the community awaits a transparent and comprehensive response from the government to ensure the well-being of those affected and uphold the principles of accountability and fairness.